The Washington Post editorial board has sparked controversy by praising President Trump’s decision to demolish the East Wing of the White House. In a surprising turn of events, the influential newspaper has commended Trump for his bold move to level the wing that was previously home to First Ladies Michelle Obama and Melania Trump.

According to the editorial board, the East Wing had become an “anachronistic relic” that no longer served its intended purpose. They argue that the wing’s outdated design and lack of modern amenities made it unsuitable for the First Lady’s role in the White House. By demolishing the East Wing, Trump is creating a more functional and efficient White House that better reflects the needs of the modern presidency.

The editorial board also notes that the decision to demolish the East Wing is a departure from the traditional approach to White House renovations. Typically, presidents have focused on updating the main residence and its surrounding buildings, but Trump’s decision to tackle the East Wing first is a bold move that signals his commitment to modernizing the entire complex.

While some may see this as a controversial move, the Washington Post editorial board believes that it is a necessary step towards creating a more functional and efficient White House. By leveling the East Wing, Trump is breaking with tradition and paving the way for a new era of leadership in the White House.

President Trump’s decision to demolish the East Wing is a bold and innovative move that signals his commitment to modernizing the White House. While it may be seen as controversial by some, the Washington Post editorial board believes that it is a necessary step towards creating a more functional and efficient presidency. As the First Lady’s role continues to evolve, the East Wing will no doubt play an important part in shaping the future of the White House.