The United States has long been considered a global superpower, but recent events have shown that it may not be as dominant as once thought. In fact, other nations like China, Russia, and Iran are playing a longer game when it comes to geopolitics, using strategies that are designed to outlast the US political clock.

While the US operates on a shorter time horizon in gauging geopolitical risks, these other nations are taking a more measured approach. China’s “fortune is coming” local saying reflects its ability to absorb pressure and execute multi-year strategies, such as automation and self-sufficiency, without being influenced by short-term political considerations. Similarly, Iran’s high pain tolerance strategy aims to “outlast” rather than “outgun” its opponents, allowing it to maintain its position in the geopolitical landscape despite facing significant challenges.

In contrast, the US operates on a shorter political clock, particularly as the midterm elections approach. This can lead to impulsive decisions that may not be in the best interests of the country long-term. While the US has historically been a leader in global affairs, it may be time for it to take a cue from these other nations and adopt a more strategic, long-term approach to geopolitics.

Ultimately, the success of China, Russia, and Iran’s strategies will depend on their ability to navigate the complexities of global politics and maintain their positions in the face of adversity. However, it is clear that these nations are playing a longer game than the US, and it may be time for the US to reassess its approach to geopolitics in order to remain a dominant player on the world stage.